HomeNewsBusinessGeorgia Power, State Energy Regulators Reach Tentative Deal on Plant Vogtle Costs

Georgia Power, State Energy Regulators Reach Tentative Deal on Plant Vogtle Costs

Author

Date

by Dave Williams | Oct 14, 2021 | Capitol Beat News Service

ATLANTA – Georgia Power would be allowed to pass on to customers $2.1 billion of the costs of completing the first of two new nuclear reactors at Plant Vogtle under a stipulation agreement outlined Thursday.

But the Atlanta-based utility wouldn’t be permitted to start recovering those costs until one month after the reactor unit goes into commercial operation, next June under the current completion schedule.

“Neither party to the stipulation received everything it wanted, but instead what staff believes is a fair and just compromise,” Steven Roetger, an analyst with the Georgia Public Service Commission’s (PSC) Public Interest Advocacy (PIA) Staff, told commissioners during a hearing on the agreement.

The PSC voted in August to stop approving incremental cost increases incurred at the long-delayed, over-budget nuclear expansion at the plant south of Augusta. Instead, commissioners have opted to postpone deciding how much of the cost overruns Georgia Power customers will have to bear until after Unit 3, the first of the two new reactors, is completed.

The project, originally projected to cost $14 billion, has ballooned to at least $26 billion.

At the same time, the completion dates have been postponed from 2016 for the first unit and 2017 for the second until 2022 and 2023, due in part to the bankruptcy of prime contractor Westinghouse and, more recently, to workforce shortages arising from the coronavirus pandemic.

Representatives of Georgia Power and the PIA Staff signed off on the stipulation agreement on Wednesday.

Under a key provision in the agreement, Georgia Power will not be allowed to pass on to customers any of the nearly $1.5 billion guarantee Japan-based Toshiba – the parent company of Westinghouse – committed to the project until after the commission decides how much of that guarantee has been spent prudently.

The agreement also for the first time gives the PSC the right to review all operating and maintenance expenses associated with Unit 3 following its completion if the reactor is not performing up to expectations.

In that case, Georgia Power would have to prove that any electrical production that falls below the expected 1,102 megawatts of generating capacity was not the result of “unreasonable or imprudent” construction.

“One of the major concerns we had was performance reliability,” Roetger testified Thursday. “We felt it was necessary to provide this commission an opportunity to review … all of the costs.”

During cross-examination of Roetger and two Georgia Power executives, lawyers for big industrial customers and environmental and consumer advocacy groups complained the agreement would let Georgia Power raise customer rates following the completion of Unit 3 next summer at the same time the utility already is scheduled to file its next regular rate case with the PSC.

“Predictability in budgeting … can be essential for businesses trying to navigate a challenging economy,” said Clay Jones, a lawyer representing the Georgia Association of Manufacturers.

Residential customers under the stipulation agreement would see a net increase of $3.78 a month starting next July, based on the typical usage of 1,000 kilowatt-hours of electricity.

Liz Coyle, executive director of the consumer advocacy group Georgia Watch, said that’s too much to pay beginning just one month after Unit 3 goes into commercial operation when there’s no guarantee the new reactor will perform properly. She cited an example where an AP1000 reactor in China – the same technology Plant Vogtle is using – did not perform reliably for a year.

“Many Georgians, especially those living on fixed incomes, are already having difficulty paying their power bills,” Coyle said. “Even $4 more a month can be problematic in terms of making ends meet.”

Roetger said the agreement strikes a necessary balance between the interests of customers and Georgia Power.

“I understand there are people who are struggling,” he said. “But we have to look at the entire state … and make sure we have a utility that can provide safe and reliable power and is financially sound.”

The commission is scheduled to vote on the agreement Nov. 2.

This story is available through a news partnership with Capitol Beat News Service, a project of the Georgia Press Educational Foundation.

2 COMMENTS

  1. I’m sure that the $3.78 increase on our monthly bill will be permanent, and eventually raised.
    When these reactors are completed, will we still have to pay the Environmental Compliance Cost and the Nuclear Construction Cost Recovery? I bet so. These two things alone are over $20 per month on my power bill.

  2. and your taxes will go up to pay the utility bills of those who live in government housing and poor old people who worked all their lives will have to turn their power of and run the risk of freezing to death or dying of heat stroke. greed from the utility companies plain and simple. why do we have to pay for this to be built? will it not pay for itself from the sale of the power it generates?

Recent posts

Recent comments

Pierce Blitch III on Augusta barber tradition continues
Tedd Antonacci on Bon Air receives failing grade
Catherine McKnight on Bon Air receives failing grade
Carolyn Vickers on Pay going up for city employees
Clarence Powell on Pay going up for city employees
Thomas Yarbrough on Pay going up for city employees
Leza Witherington on Pay going up for city employees
J. Paul Griffin on Pay going up for city employees
Catherine McKnight on Sias found guilty of federal crimes
Dianne Lackey on Dine and Dish: Calvert’s
Jimmy Clark on Faith: Swift retribution
Penny Danner on Faith: Swift retribution
Kevin de l’Aigle on Arrest made in transgender slaying
Barry Paschal on Dine and Dish: Calvert’s
THOMAS SUMNER on Dine and Dish: Calvert’s
Christine Slendak on Gold Cross increase request fails
Thomas Yarbrough on Murder suspect arrested
Thomas Yarbrough on Columbia County inmate dies
Thomas Yarbrough on Operation Grace leads to arrests
Thomas Yarbrough on Operation Grace leads to arrests
Phillip Williams on Operation Grace leads to arrests
Tedd Antonacci on Opinion: Letter to the editor
NancyBlumenthal on “Augusta” By David Sirull
Kelly Wagner on Another homicide in Augusta
Juliann McCraney on Column: Faith: Ups and downs
Robert Schloesser on Saga with Gold Cross EMS continues
Thomas Yarbrough on Garnett Johnson: In his own words
Tedd Antonacci on OPINION: Letter to the editor
Charmain Brackett on Reoccurring Members
Charmain Brackett on Short Getaways: Edisto Beach
Russell Smeak on Short Getaways: Edisto Beach
Trudy Edwards on Short Getaways: Edisto Beach
Gay Wright on Reoccurring Members
Russell Smeak on Short Getaways: Edisto Beach
Charmain Brackett on Short Getaways: Edisto Beach
Charmain Brackett on Short Getaways: Edisto Beach
Russell Smeak on Short Getaways: Edisto Beach
Thomas Plowden on Short Getaways: Edisto Beach
Charmain Brackett on Man struck by train Thursday
Thomas Yarbrough on Man struck by train Thursday
Tedd Antonacci on Man struck by train Thursday
Dennis Perry on FAITH: Our Only Hope
Nona Zimmerman on Amy Grant at the Miller May 25
Robert Turbyfill on Column: Serene18 – take two
Leonard Zimmerman Jr on In The Kitchen With Vera: Oh Honey
Bob Young on