143 Ministries withdraws rezoning application for Rockford Drive

Residents of Rockford Drive and the surrounding area attend the Columbia County Board of Commissioners meeting on Tuesday, Aug. 20 to speak out against the of 5821 Rockford Drive from R-A (Residential Agricultural) to S-1 (Special). Staff photo by Stephanie Hill

Residents of Rockford Drive and the surrounding area attend the Columbia County Board of Commissioners meeting on Tuesday, Aug. 20 to speak out against the of 5821 Rockford Drive from R-A (Residential Agricultural) to S-1 (Special). Staff photo by Stephanie Hill

Date: August 21, 2024

The Columbia County Board of Commissioners approved the withdrawing the application of 143 Ministries to rezone 5821 Rockford Drive.

Commissioners approved withdrawing with prejudice the application during the meeting on Tuesday, Aug. 20. 143 Ministries had submitted plans to build a new church building that would seat up to 250 people, as well as campground cabins for participants and counselors in its sober living ministries.

143 Ministries issues statement

In a Facebook video posted on Monday, Aug. 19, Clifton Nobles, the founder of 143 Ministries said the decision to withdraw the application was made because there was “too much going on with it.”

“I don’t want to fight the whole neighborhood and be somewhere that we’re not wanted,” Nobles said. “I’ve got friends involved with this who are being talked about. The lady, this is the thing, if there was a person that we could trust in this county to put away criminals, we should be able to trust her to tell us things. But people are talking about my friends, people who support us, slandering them, lying about them and I just don’t want to go forward any more with that.”

MORE: Qualifying to take place this week for RCBOE election

Community members speak out against rezoning

Even though the application was withdrawn, multiple residents against the rezoning spoke up during the commission meeting. Judy Horn, who lives across the street from the property, said her biggest concern is safety, and she’s unsure about the people who would’ve been at the property.

“My thing is, it’s not about the church. It’s about what the church is doing, and it’s about the people that they’re saying they’re ministering to help,” Horn said. “These are strangers that’s going to be living tighter. These are drug addicts and alcoholics and they’re going to be living together. I can’t see them sitting around in those woods sitting around a campfire singing kumbaya every night together. It’s going to be some fighting, it’s going to be some them getting mad, it’s going to be them getting ready to walk off that property whenever they get ready. When they walk off that property, my house might be the first one they walk to because I’m the closest.”

MORE: Augusta Commission votes to advertise full rollback of millage rate

Dylan and Haley Farmer, who also property west next to the property in question, spoke about their concerns with what 143 Ministries wanted to do with the property. Haley asked commisisoners if they are trying to make sure the residents are safe and if they are making sure the law is followed and their privacy is also safe. Commissioners answered yes.

“Through this whole process these past few weeks, it’s been terrible. Being right next door to it and having no idea other than a sign in the driveway…,” Haley said. “That’s a scary feeling. The fear of the unknown and if you haven’t experienced that, I hope you don’t. Because it’s scary, especially when you’re trying to start a family for the first time. It’s scary. I hope and I pray that ya’ll are up to bat for us. You’re batting for our name and our area. We want growth too, but we want it the right way. We want what’s best for the neighborhood. We want what’s best for Grovetown, Columbia County, Harlem.”

MORE: Columbia County Board of Education hears update on milestone scores

Several citizens voiced complaints about communication and said they were not informed about the hearing at the Planning Commission on Aug. 1. District 1 Commissioner Connie Melear asked about if the county failed to communicate and Deputy County Manager Matt Schlachter said that state law was followed.

“The state law dictates how we advertise that,” Schlachter said. “It was advertised in the paper before this and obviously the sign that was mentioned and obviously our website. Our packet is listed on our website for any and all to read…the application comes in, staff uploads it to the website almost immediately and it’s there for the public to start looking at it then. As we develop the staff report, the website gets updated with all the information to be seen. Again, you have to go to it to get it, we don’t have a way to push it to every individual property (owner).”

As for any future plans for the property, in his Facebook video, Nobles said they will have to see what happens. But they do have six months before they can apply again for any rezoning. 

“We own the property and we’re going to carry on and see what God wants,” Nobles said. “Whatever we do on the property will be allowed by law and we’ll continue to help people, which is what we’ve been doing.

What to Read Next

The Author

Stephanie Hill has been a journalist for over 10 years. She is a graduate of Greenbrier High School, graduated from Augusta University with a degree in journalism, and graduated from the University of South Carolina with a Masters in Mass Communication. She has previously worked at The Panola Watchman in Carthage, Texas, The White County News in Cleveland, Georgia, and The Aiken Standard in Aiken, S.C. She has experience covering cities, education, crime, and lifestyle reporting. She covers Columbia County government and the cities of Harlem and Grovetown. She has won multiple awards for her writing and photos.

Comment Policy

The Augusta Press encourages and welcomes reader comments; however, we request this be done in a respectful manner, and we retain the discretion to determine which comments violate our comment policy. We also reserve the right to hide, remove and/or not allow your comments to be posted.

The types of comments not allowed on our site include:

  • Threats of harm or violence
  • Profanity, obscenity, or vulgarity, including images of or links to such material
  • Racist comments
  • Victim shaming and/or blaming
  • Name calling and/or personal attacks;
  • Comments whose main purpose are to sell a product or promote commercial websites or services;
  • Comments that infringe on copyrights;
  • Spam comments, such as the same comment posted repeatedly on a profile.