Augusta Commission Set To Vote On Credit Card Policy

Photo courtesy of www.pexels.com

Date: July 20, 2021

At least two Augusta commissioners say that the credit card spending policy City Administrator Odie Donald unveiled at this week’s commission meeting is too little, too late.

“This is, in my opinion, a day late and a dollar short. Why wasn’t this done years ago?” District 3 Commissioner Catherine Smith-McKnight said. “I believe this is a case of people covering their butts.”

MORE: Augusta Commission Makes First Step in Reining in Mayor’s Credit Card

The new policy designates a Finance Department Director Donna Williams as the “card administrator,” giving her the power to approve or deny expenditures over a certain amount.

Single purchases are limited to $500 each, and no department or elected official can spend more than $5,000 in a calendar month without the Finance Department’s approval.

The policy also tasks the card administrator with collecting and maintaining receipts on all purchases.

[adrotate banner=”19″]


Donald’s draft of the new policy goes to great length to make it clear there is no difference between a “p-card” or a “credit card.” The policy states that the rules cover any “financial transaction card issued by any business organization, financial institution or any duly authorized agent of such organization or institution, used by a county official to purchase goods, services and other things of value on behalf of the county.”

The former financial card policy only referred to “p-cards,” which gave Augusta Mayor Hardie Davis a semantic loophole when his credit card purchases were scrutinized in the media. Davis claimed his credit card was not a p-card; therefore, the policy did not cover the use of his city issued credit card.

The policy also calls for the commission to hold a vote, which is required by Georgia Law (O.C.G.A. §§ 16-9-37 and O.C.G.A. §§  36-80-2), to allow elected officials to continue using financial transaction cards.

However, McKnight and District 10 Commissioner John Clarke say that while having an official policy is a good step forward, they are going to continue to demand a city-wide forensic audit even if the majority of the commission keeps voting the matter down in session.

Both McKnight and Clarke say constituents in their districts are demanding answers.

[adrotate banner=”54″]


“This isn’t directed at one person, but the commission is charged with conducting the people’s business, and this is part of the people’s business. There absolutely must be an accounting on how public money is spent. That should just be common sense,” Clarke said.

McKnight agreed and went a step further, commenting that departments that are well run and being financially responsible ought to be recognized for watching the purse strings and saving taxpayer’s money.

MORE: Augusta Commission Authorizes Credit Card Policy Study

“Those people in the various departments that are doing nothing wrong should welcome an audit so that the community can applaud them for doing a good job,” McKnight said.

The new policy has been placed on the commission’s consent agenda, which means there will be no discussion before the vote unless a commissioner pulls the item for discussion.

Scott Hudson is the Senior Reporter for The Augusta Press. Reach him at scott@theaugustapress.com.


[adrotate banner=”45″]

What to Read Next

The Author

Scott Hudson is an award winning investigative journalist from Augusta, GA who reported daily for WGAC AM/FM radio as well as maintaining a monthly column for the Buzz On Biz newspaper. Scott co-edited the award winning book "Augusta's WGAC: The Voice Of The Garden City For Seventy Years" and authored the book "The Contract On The Government."

Comment Policy

The Augusta Press encourages and welcomes reader comments; however, we request this be done in a respectful manner, and we retain the discretion to determine which comments violate our comment policy. We also reserve the right to hide, remove and/or not allow your comments to be posted.

The types of comments not allowed on our site include:

  • Threats of harm or violence
  • Profanity, obscenity, or vulgarity, including images of or links to such material
  • Racist comments
  • Victim shaming and/or blaming
  • Name calling and/or personal attacks;
  • Comments whose main purpose are to sell a product or promote commercial websites or services;
  • Comments that infringe on copyrights;
  • Spam comments, such as the same comment posted repeatedly on a profile.