Augusta Commissioners Get First Look at Proposed Anti-Discrimination Ordinance

Photo courtesy of iStockphoto.com

Date: May 07, 2021

A work session on April 29, 2021 gave Augusta commissioners a chance to look over a first draft of the anti-discrimination ordinance.

More questions than answers came out of the hour-long session, including requests for details or clarification on specific language in several sections of the proposal. Commissioners also want to know the bottom line – how much will this cost and whether additional staff will be needed to enforce it.

City Attorney Wayne Brown explained this is simply the first draft. Commissioners can make changes, additions and establish specific guidelines and definitions before any final ordinance is approved.

MORE: A Look at Anti-Discrimination Ordinances Across Georgia

Much of the proposed Augusta ordinance follows similar legislation in effect in at least seven other Georgia cities. It uses the same definitions in those existing ordinances for protected groups, such as age, sex, national origin, religion and sexual orientation. Augusta’s ordinance also includes the definitions of what constitutes unlawful practices as outlined in ordinances in effect in the other cities.

One area of difference is how complaints are filed and enforced in Augusta.

The proposed Augusta ordinance places initial responsibility on the city’s Compliance Department.

A complaint must be filed with the Compliance Department, in writing, within 90 calendar days of when the alleged violation occurred. The department will serve a copy of the complaint on the alleged violator within 14 calendar days. The complaint then goes to nonbinding mediation. If either side is dissatisfied with the outcome, the Compliance Department will have the Marshal’s Office notify both parties, calling them to appear for a hearing in civil and magistrate court which can lead to a trial if necessary.

[adrotate banner=”29″]

The cities with an anti-discrimination ordinance in effect said they have received no complaints.

Cost and staffing were a concern. Several commissioners asked if enforcing the ordinance will place a burden on the departments involved if extra personnel would need to be hired and projected costs. Administrator Odie McDonald said that is another area commissioners can address.

“You want to make it the smallest cost to the city for the biggest bang for your buck,” said McDonald.

Some commissioners wanted more information on specific sections.

For example, District 10 Commissioner John Clarke asked about who will do the mediation and how the mediators are trained.

District 1 Commissioner Jordan Johnson brought up the provision allowing employers to require employees to follow a “reasonable and equitable dress and grooming standard.” Johnson asked who determines what is reasonable, including dreadlocks and braids.

City Attorney Brown said those are the types of things the commissioners can decide before a final ordinance is ready for a vote.

Commissioners and the city attorney agreed on one thing: more information is needed before any ordinance is ready. They want input from citizens and the business community. Options to get that feedback include conducting a survey and holding town hall style meetings.

[adrotate banner=”19″]

Commissioners also want to hear staffing concerns from the departments and offices that will handle complaints and enforcement.

The impact on businesses is what concerns District 3 Commissioner Catherine Smith McKnight.

“We need to look at this longer,” said McKnight.

District 8 Commissioner Brandon Garrett was not at the workshop, but Augusta businesses tell him they are concerned about the impact this will have at the local level.

MORE: Augusta Commission To Consider Discrimination Ordinance

“They say they already have federal and state discrimination guidelines to follow and don’t want to add something more. Some even think it may prevent future businesses from locating in Augusta,” Garrett added.

“No time frame was set for future workshops,” Commissioner Clarke said. “If we rush it, we’re going to get it wrong.”

Dana Lynn McIntyre is a Staff Reporter with The Augusta Press. You can reach her at dana@theaugustapress.com.

[adrotate banner=”50″]

What to Read Next

The Author

Dana Lynn McIntyre is an award-winning reporter who began working in radio news in her hometown of Johnstown, Pennsylvania. She also worked as a television news photographer for a station in Altoona, Pennsylvania. Dana moved to Savannah, Ga. in 1984 to join the news team at WIXV-FM/I95 Radio. In early 1986, WBBQ Radio in Augusta invited her to interview for a position with the news department. Within three weeks, Dana was living in Olde Town and working at a legendary radio station. Dana left WBBQ in 1996 to join WJBF NewsChannel 6 as assignment manager. In 1998 she became a reporter/anchor covering law enforcement, crime and courts as well as witnessing two executions, one in Georgia, the other in South Carolina. She also spent time as an assignment manager-editor in Atlanta, metro New York City, and back in Augusta at WRDW Television. Dana joined The Augusta Press team in April 2021. Among Dana’s awards from the Georgia Associated Press Broadcasters Association are for Excellence in General Assignment Reporting, Spot News and Specialized Reporting. Dana also received an award for Public Service Reporting from the West Augusta Rotary Club for a story with actor LeVar Burton on his PBS Television show “Reading Rainbow."

Comment Policy

The Augusta Press encourages and welcomes reader comments; however, we request this be done in a respectful manner, and we retain the discretion to determine which comments violate our comment policy. We also reserve the right to hide, remove and/or not allow your comments to be posted.

The types of comments not allowed on our site include:

  • Threats of harm or violence
  • Profanity, obscenity, or vulgarity, including images of or links to such material
  • Racist comments
  • Victim shaming and/or blaming
  • Name calling and/or personal attacks;
  • Comments whose main purpose are to sell a product or promote commercial websites or services;
  • Comments that infringe on copyrights;
  • Spam comments, such as the same comment posted repeatedly on a profile.