Augusta committee rescinds budget cut from engineering, environmental services

An Augusta Commission committee reviews the plan approved last year to require all departments to cut their budgets by 1%. Susan McCord/staff

Date: July 11, 2024

One-percent budget cuts heralded by Augusta officials last year may be going by the wayside.

A commission committee recommended Tuesday to rescind most of the cut made to Augusta’s Engineering and Environmental Services department after Director Hameed Malik said it overly impacted operations.

MORE: Jury reaches verdict in Blythe vote-buying case

During regular committee meetings Tuesday, commissioners also postponed discussion to Aug. 27 of moving codes enforcement to under the Richmond County Marshal’s Office. 

The unit from Augusta Planning and Development, wearing their assigned body armor, appeared at the meeting.

Commissioner Francine Scott said a discussion with affected departments about the “pros and cons” needs to be held before the commission makes a decision.

A committee also received an Augusta Parks and Recreation strategic plan as information, rather than recommend approval. Some commissioners complained the meeting presentation lacked detail about the plan.

On the 1% cuts, Malik said while department directors were given leeway to choose where to make the cuts, avoiding necessary expenses – such as contracted services – left other budgets, such as training and materials, overly depleted.

“When it comes to the end of the year, we may not have money to pay for the last month to the contractor,” he said.

Finance Director Donna Williams said staff were following the commission’s directive to cut 1% across the board. “It was not limited to operations,” she said. But the directive also provided for a six-month review of its impact, she said.

Seven commissioners and Mayor Garnett Johnson backed making the cut, across the board to all departments and nongovernmental entities receiving local funds.

Commissioner Wayne Guilfoyle said someone should have considered the cut’s impact on contractors, particularly on departments that rely heavily on contract services.

square ad for junk in the box

Commissioner Tony Lewis made a motion to approve Malik’s request to eliminate all but 1% cuts on operations and make none at Environmental Services. The commission is expected to look at other departments July 30.

Commissioner Jordan Johnson questioned why Malik was going through the commission rather than follow the chain of command. Malik and Williams said they’d had a lot of dialogue about how to make the cuts prior to Malik taking this route.

Guilfoyle added that he preferred department heads make individual budget requests to the commission, so it can “find out the wants and needs” of each.

What to Read Next

The Author

Susan McCord is a veteran journalist and writer who began her career at publications in Asheville, N.C. She spent nearly a decade at newspapers across rural southwest Georgia, then returned to her Augusta hometown for a position at the print daily. She’s a graduate of the Academy of Richmond County and the University of Georgia. Susan is dedicated to transparency and ethics, both in her work and in the beats she covers. She is the recipient of multiple awards, including a Ravitch Fiscal Reporting Fellowship, first place for hard news writing from the Georgia Press Association and the Morris Communications Community Service Award. **Not involved with Augusta Press editorials

Comment Policy

The Augusta Press encourages and welcomes reader comments; however, we request this be done in a respectful manner, and we retain the discretion to determine which comments violate our comment policy. We also reserve the right to hide, remove and/or not allow your comments to be posted.

The types of comments not allowed on our site include:

  • Threats of harm or violence
  • Profanity, obscenity, or vulgarity, including images of or links to such material
  • Racist comments
  • Victim shaming and/or blaming
  • Name calling and/or personal attacks;
  • Comments whose main purpose are to sell a product or promote commercial websites or services;
  • Comments that infringe on copyrights;
  • Spam comments, such as the same comment posted repeatedly on a profile.