Augusta holds first hearing on HB 581

Augusta Administrator Tameka Allen speaks to residents at a Tuesday hearing on House BIll 581, which creates a new homestead tax break. Staff photo by Susan McCord

Augusta Administrator Tameka Allen speaks to residents at a Tuesday hearing on House BIll 581, which creates a new homestead tax break. Staff photo by Susan McCord

Date: February 05, 2025

A crowd of about 100 let Augusta officials know Tuesday that homeowners are concerned about property taxes.

The topic was House Bill 581, the new state law that creates a tax break for homeowners and the opportunity for a new sales tax, unless local governments opt out.

Sixty-two percent of Augusta voters approved a November referendum that authorized the break, known as a floating homestead exemption, as well as the potential to opt out.

City officials emphasized Tuesday that while owner-occupied homes will get a break in taxes if the government doesn’t opt out, the tax burden won’t go away. Instead the government will likely turn to non-exempt properties, such as commercial, to make up the difference.

The break would apply to 38% of real estate parcels in Augusta-Richmond County, or approximately 31,000 properties. The new exemptions would subtract $72 million in taxable property from the tax digest, the register of all taxable properties, according to a presentation.

Should Augusta implement the optional sales tax, the new revenue could be used to offset money lost from the exemption. Coupled with Augusta’s existing local option sales tax, the additional sales tax would shift the city’s percentage reliance on sales taxes to property taxes from 50-50 to 70-30, Interim Finance Director Tim Schroer said.

Mayor Garnett Johnson said he had not decided whether opting out is the best path forward.

“I like the idea of your tax dollars being saved and not used by our local government,” Johnson said. “I haven’t made up my mind about which way I’m going to vote.”

Several of the questions raised by residents centered on why the commission would overlook the will voters expressed in November.

Why weren’t public hearings held before the referendum, one asked.

Why would Augusta opt out if voters said yes, said another.

“Do you not know how much money the city is needing to spend” in the coming year, another said.

Johnson noted the active lobbying by the Augusta Metro Chamber of Commerce, which objects to the burden being passed to business and commercial property owners. If Augusta opts in and neighboring jurisdictions don’t, businesses might consider moving where taxes are lower, he said.

If Augusta opts in and levies the additional sales tax, it will be limited to a half cent because the city is only a half-cent from the state’s sales tax cap, he said. 

The Augusta Commission has through March 1 to make a decision. The next hearings are scheduled for Feb. 11 and Feb. 18.

What to Read Next

The Author

Susan McCord is a veteran journalist and writer who began her career at publications in Asheville, N.C. She spent nearly a decade at newspapers across rural southwest Georgia, then returned to her Augusta hometown for a position at the print daily. She’s a graduate of the Academy of Richmond County and the University of Georgia. Susan is dedicated to transparency and ethics, both in her work and in the beats she covers. She is the recipient of multiple awards, including a Ravitch Fiscal Reporting Fellowship, first place for hard news writing from the Georgia Press Association and the Morris Communications Community Service Award. **Not involved with Augusta Press editorials

Comment Policy

The Augusta Press encourages and welcomes reader comments; however, we request this be done in a respectful manner, and we retain the discretion to determine which comments violate our comment policy. We also reserve the right to hide, remove and/or not allow your comments to be posted.

The types of comments not allowed on our site include:

  • Threats of harm or violence
  • Profanity, obscenity, or vulgarity, including images of or links to such material
  • Racist comments
  • Victim shaming and/or blaming
  • Name calling and/or personal attacks;
  • Comments whose main purpose are to sell a product or promote commercial websites or services;
  • Comments that infringe on copyrights;
  • Spam comments, such as the same comment posted repeatedly on a profile.