Augusta Personnel Board Votes Unanimously to Uphold Employee Firing

Augusta commissioners voted down a new contract with EMS provider Gold Cross but agreed to hold a workshop on job qualifications for the city administrator Tuesday.

Meeting at Augusta Municipal Building Tuesday, commissioners voted down a new contract with EMS provider Gold Cross but agreed to hold a workshop on job qualifications for the city administrator Tuesday.

Date: February 04, 2021

The Augusta Personnel Board voted Wednesday to uphold the firing of a former Richmond County Correctional Institution employee.

Miguel Rosario was seeking to have his termination stripped from his employment record.

The appeal stemmed from an incident Nov. 3, 2020, in which Rosario, a detail worker serving as a supervisor, refused to work in a location that housed two inmates with COVID-19.

[adrotate banner=”19″]

Rosario, who represented himself at the hearing, told board members he was concerned about the safety of his health if he worked that assignment. He said he told his supervisor, St. Sylvester Giddents, that he would “rather go home.” Giddens said he told Rosario to do whatever he thought he “needed to do.”

Rosario did not call in and did not show up for work the following two days. Rosario claimed that monitoring COVID-19 inmates was beyond the scope of his official job title. His duties typically included taking inmates outside, he said.

City staff attorney Jenise Smith questioned Warden Evan Joseph regarding his recommendation to terminate Rosario’s employment as of Nov. 17.

According to Joseph, Rosario had faced several disciplinary actions between 2017 and 2019 that involved improperly submitting requests for leave and for arguing with a supervisor.

“I looked at his entire history, and in my opinion, I just didn’t feel that Mr. Rosario was salvageable,” Joseph said.

[adrotate banner=”13″]

Smith explained that the city considered Nov. 3 as a no-show because Rosario left before his shift ended. That, she added, met the department’s requirement for termination of employment.

Rosario said that he did not want to be reinstated to his job with RCCI and disputed details of previous incidents. He stated that Giddens gave him permission to go home. He admitted to not calling in and not showing up for work on Nov. 4 and 5 but pointed out that procedure dictated he receive a suspension if he did. He asked the board to expunge the termination status from his record.

“I am not trying to go back to work there. There are a lot of things that go on there that I do not agree with,” he said.

Throughout the hearing, Rosario questioned the board about not being given the opportunity to question some of the city’s witnesses, including Giddens and Administrator Odie Donald.

After a short executive session, the board unanimously voted to uphold the city’s decision to fire Rosario. Rosario had been employed with the department since 2016.

Shellie Smitley is a correspondent for The Augusta Press. Reach her at producers@theaugustapress.com

[adrotate banner=”38″]

What to Read Next

The Author

Shellie Smitley spent her childhood in Wisconsin. As an adult she lived in Sevier County, TN for more than 15 years where she earned an associate degree in paralegal studies from Walters State Community College. After relocating to Augusta, she earned an undergraduate degree in Communications with an emphasis in journalism from Augusta University. After graduation, she worked at the Iola Register where she was awarded two Kansas AP awards. She has also written for The Lake Oconee News. She is currently working on a graduate degree in public administration at Augusta University. Her travels include a trip to China. She is the mother of two grown children and the grandmother of three boys. She considers reading The Bible from beginning to end as one of her greatest accomplishments.

Comment Policy

The Augusta Press encourages and welcomes reader comments; however, we request this be done in a respectful manner, and we retain the discretion to determine which comments violate our comment policy. We also reserve the right to hide, remove and/or not allow your comments to be posted.

The types of comments not allowed on our site include:

  • Threats of harm or violence
  • Profanity, obscenity, or vulgarity, including images of or links to such material
  • Racist comments
  • Victim shaming and/or blaming
  • Name calling and/or personal attacks;
  • Comments whose main purpose are to sell a product or promote commercial websites or services;
  • Comments that infringe on copyrights;
  • Spam comments, such as the same comment posted repeatedly on a profile.