Augusta Planning Commission approves rezoning request for south Augusta townhomes, with conditions

Augusta Planning Commission photo commemorating its transition to 2023, with Sonny Pittman, center as its new chair, replacing Commissioner James O'Neal, right of center. Photo provided by Planning Commission.

Date: February 07, 2023

The Augusta Planning Commission voted in favor of a proposed subdivision of south Augusta townhomes in its February meeting on Monday afternoon, though the petitioner may still have to plead his case to the full commission.

Bobby Bagwell of Piedmont Holdings requested to rezone some seven acres along Windsor Spring Road from One-family Residential to R-3B Multifamily Residential, in order to build a neighborhood of 30 townhome dwellings at 3.9 units per acre.

Senior Planner Brian Kepner explained to the planning commissioners that approximately 10% of the 11 parcels are located within the Zone AE Special Flood Hazard Area, though the conceptual site plans submitted with the application indicate that none of the proposed townhome lots are located within and that flood hazard area.

While no one objected to the rezoning, residents Sandra and Alexander Howard raised concerns as a nearby pond sits on both the proposed development area as well as a portion of property upon which they had recently began building a home.

“Our biggest concern would be whether the pond would be in danger,” said Sondra Howard, also asking whether a privacy fence or some other kind of buffer would be available for their privacy.

Bagwell assured the commission, and the Howards, that the plan for the townhome subdivision entails a natural buffer against the pond—considered a wetland area, with no plans to discharge any stormwater locked into it.

Bagwell also told the commissioners that Piedmont Holdings considered several plan revisions in doing due diligence for development at the site, losing density in the process.

Staff recommended approval of the rezoning, but included among its conditions that lot sizes be 25 feet, instead of the 22-foot lots in the plan. Bagwell objected to this condition, saying it would cost the project four units.

After Commissioner George Lock McKnight asked Bagwell if he would comply to an added condition requiring various façade styles and restricting the use of vinyl siding (which Bagwell said he would), the commissioners unanimously voted to approve Bagwell’s rezoning request, but still including the staff recommended condition requiring 25-foot lots.

Vice-Chair Jeffrey Pooser motioned to reconsider the vote. Ultimately, however, the motion to reconsider was voted down.

Staff advised the planning commissioners that since the Planning Commissions voted to approve the request under conditions Bagwell did not agree with it, Bagwell would have to plead his case for 22-foot lots when the item goes before the Augusta Commission.

Skyler Q. Andrews is a staff reporter covering business for The Augusta Press. Reach him at skyler@theaugustapress.com.

What to Read Next

The Author

Skyler Andrews is a bona fide native of the CSRA; born in Augusta, raised in Aiken, with family roots in Edgefield County, S.C., and presently residing in the Augusta area. A graduate of University of South Carolina - Aiken with a Bachelor of Arts in English, he has produced content for Verge Magazine, The Aiken Standard and the Augusta Conventions and Visitors Bureau. Amid working various jobs from pest control to life insurance and real estate, he is also an active in the Augusta arts community; writing plays, short stories and spoken-word pieces. He can often be found throughout downtown with his nose in a book, writing, or performing stand-up comedy.

Comment Policy

The Augusta Press encourages and welcomes reader comments; however, we request this be done in a respectful manner, and we retain the discretion to determine which comments violate our comment policy. We also reserve the right to hide, remove and/or not allow your comments to be posted.

The types of comments not allowed on our site include:

  • Threats of harm or violence
  • Profanity, obscenity, or vulgarity, including images of or links to such material
  • Racist comments
  • Victim shaming and/or blaming
  • Name calling and/or personal attacks;
  • Comments whose main purpose are to sell a product or promote commercial websites or services;
  • Comments that infringe on copyrights;
  • Spam comments, such as the same comment posted repeatedly on a profile.