Bill on Augusta mayor’s vote passes House, heads to governor

Georgia Senate Bill 231, which calls for a referendum on giving Augusta's mayor a vote on all commission decisions, passed the House today and now heads to Gov. Brian Kemp for his signature.

Date: March 14, 2023

Georgia Senate Bill 231, which calls for a referendum on giving Augusta’s mayor a vote on all commission decisions, passed the state House Tuesday, Rep. Mark Newton, R-Augusta, confirmed.

Newton and Sen. Max Burns, R-Sylvania, ushered the bill through both chambers after a request from Augusta Mayor Garnett Johnson and five Augusta commissioners.

“Sen. Burns and I received a written request from six of the 11 local elected city leaders requesting we consider a citizen referendum on allowing the mayor an equal vote on city/county business, as an effort to streamline and improve the operation of our government,” Newton said.

Augusta Rep. Mark Newton
Augusta Rep. Mark Newton supported a bill asking voters to decide whether the mayor needs a full-time vote on the commission.

The bill passed along party lines 99-70, with Augusta’s four Democratic House members – Gloria Frazier, Lynn Gladney, Karlton Howard and Brian Prince – voting no. It now heads to Gov. Brian Kemp for approval.

If it passes, the bill calls for the referendum to appear on next year’s general primary ballot, where Augusta voters will have the final say on giving the mayor a vote. Since consolidation with Richmond County in 1996, the mayor has only voted in the event of a tie, and the setup allows commissioners to strategically abstain to avoid creating ties.

“We trust the citizens of Augusta to review this proposed advantages of this change and decide in a referendum whether to move forward,” Newton said.

Newton said he and Burns were receptive to further review of the Consolidation Act, which created the weak-mayor form of government that leaves most government decisions to the 10- (or possibly 11-) member commission. Other members of Augusta’s legislative delegation and city commissioners have suggested a broader look, possibly with help from an outside entity such as the Carl Vinson Institute of Government at the University of Georgia, was needed.

Augusta Mayor Garnett Johnson
Augusta Mayor Garnett Johnson supports a bill asking voters to decide whether to give the mayor a full-time vote on the commission.

“We look forward to also working in any way needed with others who have suggested an even more thorough, overall study and assessment of our 1996 charter to evaluate potential additional areas where improvements may be made,” he said. “Passage of Senate Bill 231 is an excellent first step, allowing voters to decide this important issue.”

What to Read Next

The Author

Susan McCord is a veteran journalist and writer who began her career at publications in Asheville, N.C. She spent nearly a decade at newspapers across rural southwest Georgia, then returned to her Augusta hometown for a position at the print daily. She’s a graduate of the Academy of Richmond County and the University of Georgia. Susan is dedicated to transparency and ethics, both in her work and in the beats she covers. She is the recipient of multiple awards, including a Ravitch Fiscal Reporting Fellowship, first place for hard news writing from the Georgia Press Association and the Morris Communications Community Service Award. **Not involved with Augusta Press editorials

Comment Policy

The Augusta Press encourages and welcomes reader comments; however, we request this be done in a respectful manner, and we retain the discretion to determine which comments violate our comment policy. We also reserve the right to hide, remove and/or not allow your comments to be posted.

The types of comments not allowed on our site include:

  • Threats of harm or violence
  • Profanity, obscenity, or vulgarity, including images of or links to such material
  • Racist comments
  • Victim shaming and/or blaming
  • Name calling and/or personal attacks;
  • Comments whose main purpose are to sell a product or promote commercial websites or services;
  • Comments that infringe on copyrights;
  • Spam comments, such as the same comment posted repeatedly on a profile.