Brief: Pending charges against deputy don’t justify withholding publicly-taken video

Date: August 04, 2023

The disorderly conduct charge against a Burke County sheriff’s deputy remains pending. But the pending charge can’t be used to withhold body cam video from his arrest in Augusta.

The Augusta Press filed a brief Friday in the news organization’s lawsuit against Richmond County Sheriff Richard Roundtree over access to the video, which Roundtree’s office claims is exempt from disclosure.

The Augusta Press requested the video after the March 25 arrest of Burke County Sheriff’s Sgt. Allen Crispin by Richmond County Sheriff’s Sgt. Ty Hester at the Augusta Hispanic Festival. 

The brief contends body cam video is no different from the initial incident reports that Georgia law enforcement agencies are required to release.

The Georgia Open Records Act “does not exempt disclosure of law enforcement video that preceded an arrest, if it was used in a follow-up investigation,” writes David Hudson, attorney for The Augusta Press and the Georgia Press Association.

“The information in an initial arrest report might indeed become a significant part of a followup investigation or prosecution,” he writes. “The report may contain names of witnesses, details of a scene, or a description of a suspect. But the information that was available before it was written into a ‘police arrest report’ must be disclosed under O.C.G.A. 50-18-72(a)(4).”

The argument that just because a public record, the video, might end up in an investigation doesn’t have to be released is flawed, the brief states. Had the legislature intended that information be exempt from disclosure, it would not have required all initial arrest and incident reports be disclosed.

“The pre-arrest video should be treated the same – it should be disclosed. What it shows happened in public and before an arrest or investigation,” it says.

In addition, the open records act spells out when law enforcement video must be released, saying it may be withheld only where those involved had an expectation of privacy or when an investigation is pending, it says. 

Crispin charges still under consideration

Crispin’s disorderly conduct case has been transferred to Richmond County State Court where Solicitor General Omeeka Loggins said she has not made a decision on whether to move forward with prosecution. Its movement was delayed by litigation, she said.

Joe Edge, publisher of The Augusta Press, said it’s in the public interest for law enforcement to release body cam video taken in public with no expectation of privacy. 

“With all the controversies surrounding the Richmond County Sheriff’s Office, the public needs and deserves to be able to critique how they perform their role of public servants,” Edge said. “If nothing was improper, then there should be no reason not to release the video.”

Richmond County leadership is known to critique the Columbia County Sheriff’s Office for not wearing body cameras, but “when the cameras allegedly show something embarrassing to RCSO deputies, they try to abuse the Open Records Act to avoid disclosure,” Edge said.

What to Read Next

The Author

Susan McCord is a veteran journalist and writer who began her career at publications in Asheville, N.C. She spent nearly a decade at newspapers across rural southwest Georgia, then returned to her Augusta hometown for a position at the print daily. She’s a graduate of the Academy of Richmond County and the University of Georgia. Susan is dedicated to transparency and ethics, both in her work and in the beats she covers. She is the recipient of multiple awards, including a Ravitch Fiscal Reporting Fellowship, first place for hard news writing from the Georgia Press Association and the Morris Communications Community Service Award. **Not involved with Augusta Press editorials

Comment Policy

The Augusta Press encourages and welcomes reader comments; however, we request this be done in a respectful manner, and we retain the discretion to determine which comments violate our comment policy. We also reserve the right to hide, remove and/or not allow your comments to be posted.

The types of comments not allowed on our site include:

  • Threats of harm or violence
  • Profanity, obscenity, or vulgarity, including images of or links to such material
  • Racist comments
  • Victim shaming and/or blaming
  • Name calling and/or personal attacks;
  • Comments whose main purpose are to sell a product or promote commercial websites or services;
  • Comments that infringe on copyrights;
  • Spam comments, such as the same comment posted repeatedly on a profile.