Burke sheriff withdraws motion to seal, moves forward with lawsuit against county

Burke County Sheriff Alfonzo Williams, left, appears with attorneys Pierre Ifill and Shawn McCullers at a Thursday news conference. Staff photo by Susan McCord

Date: June 20, 2025

Attorneys for Burke County Sheriff Alfonzo Williams say they’re withdrawing a motion to seal court documents and filing a writ of mandamus against the Burke County Commission.

The move could end a longstanding conflict over money in the county of around 25,000 people. Since he took office, Williams has struggled with the commission over control of his budget. 

He’s made advances and cooperated with commissioners on some matters, but contends they continue to frustrate his efforts and risk harm by withholding vital funding. 

The commission has responded with allegations of questionable spending and a lack of control, and has asked the Georgia Bureau of Investigation to take a look.

A recent move by Williams was to file incident reports accusing commissioners and the county manager of violating their oaths of office.

A writ of mandamus could help set the record straight if a judge agrees. The writ is a court order compelling a government official to take or cease to take a specific action.

Attorneys for Williams, Shawn McCullers and Pierre Ifill, spoke at the news conference held at the sheriff’s office Thursday about their next steps.

McCullers said they asked to seal the court record to protect the county from more lawsuits, but withdrew the request after Burke objected.

He stressed that ultimate control and broad discretion is granted sheriffs over their budgets by the Georgia Constitution.

Because Georgia sheriffs are constitutional officers, a county “has no control over anything in the sheriff’s office,” McCullers said. The county’s “sole duty” is to approve the budget of a sheriff, not determine how it is spent, he said.

Furthermore, the commission’s beef with Williams is “personal,” Ifill said. “It has nothing to do with the office itself.”

Ifill gave the handful of reporters attending the news conference a stern warning. 

“Intentional misinformation” has been spread about Williams, Ifill said. Those responsible should expect “all the legal redress” available. “We will sue them to the full extent of the law.”

Asked earlier Thursday to comment, Burke County officials said the sheriff’s office is “very well funded.” The office was budgeted some $12.9 million this year.

“The commission believes he is adequately funded and we expect him to stay within budget,” said Burke Commission Chairman Evans Martin. “It is unfortunate that the taxpayers of Burke County have to endure the burden of him suing the commissioners and the citizens.”

The case hasn’t been assigned to a judge and it won’t be assigned to one of the five Superior Court judges of the Augusta Circuit. Each of them recused themselves from the case last week. 

In addition, District Attorney Jared Williams said he had a conflict of interest between his duties as prosecutor and involvement with the GBI probe and asked that two new prosecutors be assigned to the case.

Similar conflicts have played out elsewhere in Georgia. On Tuesday, Fulton County Sheriff Pat Labat sued county officials over a purchasing policy he said infringed on his authority.

What to Read Next

The Author

Susan McCord is a veteran journalist and writer who began her career at publications in Asheville, N.C. She spent nearly a decade at newspapers across rural southwest Georgia, then returned to her Augusta hometown for a position at the print daily. She’s a graduate of the Academy of Richmond County and the University of Georgia. Susan is dedicated to transparency and ethics, both in her work and in the beats she covers. She is the recipient of multiple awards, including a Ravitch Fiscal Reporting Fellowship, first place for hard news writing from the Georgia Press Association and the Morris Communications Community Service Award.

Comment Policy

The Augusta Press encourages and welcomes reader comments; however, we request this be done in a respectful manner, and we retain the discretion to determine which comments violate our comment policy. We also reserve the right to hide, remove and/or not allow your comments to be posted.

The types of comments not allowed on our site include:

  • Threats of harm or violence
  • Profanity, obscenity, or vulgarity, including images of or links to such material
  • Racist comments
  • Victim shaming and/or blaming
  • Name calling and/or personal attacks;
  • Comments whose main purpose are to sell a product or promote commercial websites or services;
  • Comments that infringe on copyrights;
  • Spam comments, such as the same comment posted repeatedly on a profile.