Citizens Encouraged to Build Their Own Budget at Community Engagement Forum

Augusta Fire Chief Antonio Burden addressing attendees at the forum, Monday, Sept. 27. Staff photo by Marcus Plumlee.

Date: September 29, 2021

The second of four Community Budget Engagement Forums was held Sept. 27 at the May Park Community Center. The series is part of an effort by city administrators to educate and gather input from Augustans on the annual budget.

The event had approximately 70 attendees — more than double the turnout of the first forum held on Sept. 9 at the Julian Smith Casino.

“I’m actually surprised that so many folks are coming out and getting involved. It’s a pleasant surprise,” said city administrator Odie Donald.

MORE: Opinion: Give City Your Two Cents at Community Budget Forums

Donald hosted the forum, which included presentations from the department heads of environmental services, planning & development, finance and the fire department. Between presentations, attendees created two simulated budgets.

This required splitting up the city’s approximately $175 million general fund for services among eight categories: public safety, judicial services, quality of life, taxation, transportation, infrastructure, economic development and government services.

[adrotate banner=”19″]


The first exercise demonstrated the chaotic nature of creating a budget on a deadline, as attendees had twelve minutes to fill out their worksheets while various administrators traveled from table to table pitching their department’s needs.

The second exercise, which came at the end of the forum, required cooperation and compromise as each table worked together to compile a budget. The groups then presented their results, detailing which departments they gave the most and least funding to and why.

MORE: North Augusta City Council Takes First Look at 2022 Budget

Some groups prioritized public safety while others focused on government services. Former Augusta commissioner Bill Fennoy was in attendance and gave top funding to improvements in infrastructure.

Ormeca Scruggs. Staff photo by Marcus Plumlee.

Terence Dicks, chairman of Augusta’s transit citizens’ advisory committee, emphasized transportation, calling it “the difference between us being the second-largest city versus the third,” referencing Augusta’s recent fall in population ranking to Columbus.

Worksheets were collected at the end of the forum, and administrators encouraged attendees to visit an online survey for any additional input. That survey can be found here.

Donald said he expects the forums to make a direct impact on the budget.

“I know they will,” he said, “because I’ll use all of the data and information to make decisions on certain things that get cut, certain things that remain in the budget, and what type of recommendations we make to the [Augusta] Commission.”

While many government employees and community groups were in attendance, some citizens came on their own.

Ormeca Scruggs, an accounts receivable specialist, said, “I really want to get more involved in what’s going on with my city. I’ve been here about ten years, and this is my first [public forum].”

Augusta citizens have two more chances to attend, with forums on Saturday, Oct. 2 from noon to 2 p.m. at the Bernie Ward Community Center (register here) and Wednesday, Oct. 13 from 5 p.m. to 7 p.m. at the Warren Road Community Center (register here).

Marcus Plumlee is a Columnist for The Augusta Press. Reach him at mplumlee87@icloud.com.


[adrotate banner=”51″]

What to Read Next

The Author

Comment Policy

The Augusta Press encourages and welcomes reader comments; however, we request this be done in a respectful manner, and we retain the discretion to determine which comments violate our comment policy. We also reserve the right to hide, remove and/or not allow your comments to be posted.

The types of comments not allowed on our site include:

  • Threats of harm or violence
  • Profanity, obscenity, or vulgarity, including images of or links to such material
  • Racist comments
  • Victim shaming and/or blaming
  • Name calling and/or personal attacks;
  • Comments whose main purpose are to sell a product or promote commercial websites or services;
  • Comments that infringe on copyrights;
  • Spam comments, such as the same comment posted repeatedly on a profile.