Columbia County School Board votes to certify estimated rollback rate

Date: June 12, 2025

The Columbia County Board of Education voted to set its estimated millage rollback to 16.5, Tuesday evening during its regular session in observance of Georgia House Bill (HB) 92.

Formerly, the annual notice of assessment (NOA) sent by the tax assessor to homeowners would include the previous year’s millage rate for each authority (the county, the school district and, if one lives in an incorporated city, the municipality), along with an estimated tax liability based on that millage rate.

In February the school district voted to opt out of the floating exemption outlined in HB 581. HB 92, passed and signed this year to amend HB 581, added deadlines and fallback provisions. The bill also requires local governments to provide a certified estimated rollback rate for the current year no later than 15 days before the NOA is postmarked.

The estimated rollback is calculated by taking the current year’s millage rate and subtracting the millage equivalent of the total net assessed value added by reassessments of property. If a local government does not certify its estimated rollback rate before NOAs are issued, then previous year’s millage rate will appear on the notice.

MORE: Richmond County School District tentatively approves 2026 budget

“The estimated rollback rate is hard for us to determine without information from the tax assessor’s office,” said Alex Casado, the school district’s chief financial officer, to the board members. “We have received information from them and what the value of the digest increase is due to reassessment versus growth of new properties in the county.”

square ad for junk in the box

Casado recommended that the district set an estimated rollback rate of 16.5 mills, from the current rate of 17.1 mills. If the district selects that number as the actual millage rate in the coming weeks, he said, it would reduce property tax revenue by about $1.6 million from what was budgeted, and would be absorbed by reducing the district’s fund balance. However, the district will still be able to set any millage rate they choose up to the 20 mill cap.

The board members would vote 3 to 1 in favor of adapting the estimated rollback rate, with only District 4 board member Katie Allen opposing (Kristi Baker of District 2 was not present at the meeting).

“I just want to point out that our budget that we approved has about a $3.6 million deficit, and if we’re looking at another $1.6 million decrease in revenue, that makes a $5.2 million deficit,” said Allen during the board’s discussion of the item. “So I just want us to start thinking in advance of what we can do from an operation standpoint, because I really I like that we have a large fund balance, but I really don’t like the idea of us using that fund balance for operations expenses.”

MORE: Boys & Girls Club’s Aviation Academy takes flight for third year

Skyler Andrews is a reporter covering business for The Augusta Press. Reach him at skyler@theaugustapress.com.

What to Read Next

The Author

Skyler Andrews is a bona fide native of the CSRA; born in Augusta, raised in Aiken, with family roots in Edgefield County, S.C., and presently residing in the Augusta area. A graduate of University of South Carolina - Aiken with a Bachelor of Arts in English, he has produced content for Verge Magazine, The Aiken Standard and the Augusta Conventions and Visitors Bureau. Amid working various jobs from pest control to life insurance and real estate, he is also an active in the Augusta arts community; writing plays, short stories and spoken-word pieces. He can often be found throughout downtown with his nose in a book, writing, or performing stand-up comedy.

Comment Policy

The Augusta Press encourages and welcomes reader comments; however, we request this be done in a respectful manner, and we retain the discretion to determine which comments violate our comment policy. We also reserve the right to hide, remove and/or not allow your comments to be posted.

The types of comments not allowed on our site include:

  • Threats of harm or violence
  • Profanity, obscenity, or vulgarity, including images of or links to such material
  • Racist comments
  • Victim shaming and/or blaming
  • Name calling and/or personal attacks;
  • Comments whose main purpose are to sell a product or promote commercial websites or services;
  • Comments that infringe on copyrights;
  • Spam comments, such as the same comment posted repeatedly on a profile.