Commission gives Augusta Land Bank Authority $1 million

A blighted property at 1016 Calhoun Way. Staff photo.

Date: November 02, 2022

The Augusta Commission agreed at its Nov. 1 meeting to provide the Augusta Land Bank Authority with $1 million in American Rescue Plan funding for upkeep or demolition of property and to combat blight.

The vote was 8 – 2 with District 10 Commissioner John Clarke and District 3 Commissioner Catherine McKnight voting “no.”

Augusta Land Bank Authority Director Shawn Edwards presented a spreadsheet showing where the land bank intends to spend the money.

According to the spreadsheet, $625,000 will be used to rehabilitate 25 homes, $125,000 to acquire 50 properties through the tax foreclosure process, $210,000 for demolition, $270,000 for cutting grass at lots managed by the land bank and $43,750 to mothball properties.

MORE: Augusta Land Bank Authority requests American Rescue Plan funding

However, eyebrows were raised at the line item for $266,883 to be used to hire staff and $34,367 as a “contingency” fund.

“Is this a duplication of services from another department?” District 7 Commissioner Sean Frantom asked Interim City Administrator Takiyah Douse.

Douse responded that it was an “extension of the services we already offer.”

Mayor Hardie Davis Jr. asked if the more proper funding source would be federal Community Block Grant funding that already flows into the city.

Edwards responded by telling the mayor that those funds went direct to the city and the land bank could not apply for them on its own. Edwards also added that he was advised by former Administrator Odie Donald to ask for the ARP funding since the money came from the federal government.

“Aren’t CBG funds federal?” Davis asked.

“Yes, sir,” Edwards said.

The Augusta Land Bank Authority is somewhat of an island upon itself. While its website claims the land bank is a non-profit agency, it is not listed with the Secretary of State’s Office. Board Chairman Chris Johnson explains that the land bank is actually an “authority” that was set up in 1996, shortly after consolidation.

While the land bank manages its own bank account and operates out of a private office, the city pays for its two full-time employees.

In past press accounts, several commissioners have admitted they know little about the land bank or how it operates until it came to light that former State Sen. Charles Walker was sold land bank held property for a fraction of its value.

In that instance, the land in question was not placed on auction or sold by sealed bid, but rather quietly sold off to Walker.

MORE: City land deal with The Walker Group raises eyebrows

McKnight says she is troubled that the land bank would ask for such a large amount of money without identifying exactly which properties are going to be purchased or rehabbed.

McKnight also questioned why the land bank needed money to mothball, or board up property, when their stated mission was to return formerly blighted property to the tax digest.

“We need to know more about the properties, the addresses and who owns them. We need more information. We can’t just keep giving away money without knowing exactly where it is going,” McKnight said.

Scott Hudson is the senior reporter for The Augusta Press. Reach him at scott@theaugustapress.com 

What to Read Next

The Author

Scott Hudson is an award winning investigative journalist from Augusta, GA who reported daily for WGAC AM/FM radio as well as maintaining a monthly column for the Buzz On Biz newspaper. Scott co-edited the award winning book "Augusta's WGAC: The Voice Of The Garden City For Seventy Years" and authored the book "The Contract On The Government."

Comment Policy

The Augusta Press encourages and welcomes reader comments; however, we request this be done in a respectful manner, and we retain the discretion to determine which comments violate our comment policy. We also reserve the right to hide, remove and/or not allow your comments to be posted.

The types of comments not allowed on our site include:

  • Threats of harm or violence
  • Profanity, obscenity, or vulgarity, including images of or links to such material
  • Racist comments
  • Victim shaming and/or blaming
  • Name calling and/or personal attacks;
  • Comments whose main purpose are to sell a product or promote commercial websites or services;
  • Comments that infringe on copyrights;
  • Spam comments, such as the same comment posted repeatedly on a profile.