DOE Greenlights Pit Production at SRS While Environmental Groups File Suit to Stop It

Photo courtesy www.srswatch.org / ©High Flyer, special to SRS Watch - photo can be used with this credit

Date: July 01, 2021

One day after the National Nuclear Security Administration recommended pit production at the Savannah River Site, an environmental group announced it has filed a lawsuit against the plan.

On Monday, the Department of Energy’s NNSA approved the Critical Decision milestone, clearing the way to produce at least 50 pits a year at the Savannah River Plutonium Processing Facility.

MORE: Skyrocketing Budget Requested for the Savannah River Site

Pits are bowling ball-sized shells of plutonium that are an integral part of nuclear weapons production.

On Tuesday, several advocacy groups announced a lawsuit had been filed with the U.S. District Court for South Carolina.

[adrotate banner=”19″]

The groups involved include the South Carolina Environmental Law Project, Savannah River Site Watch and Nuclear Watch New Mexico.

SCELP Attorney Leslie Lenhardt said, “We’re seeking an order requiring both DOE and NNSA to follow the mandates of the National Environmental Policy Act, otherwise know as NEPA, and conduct a new or supplemental environmental review on programmatic level of this change in the process of nuclear weapons production.”

Tom Clements, director of Savannah River Site Watch, said SRS has never stored, processed or produced pits.

He said, “Production of pits at SRS will be a daunting technical challenge that has not been properly reviewed. Choosing SRS for pit production was done for parochial, political reason due to the failure of the Mixed Oxide Plutonium fuel project.”

[adrotate banner=”54″]

Specifically, in their lawsuit the groups said DOE has not done a Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement. They said a PEIS is necessary to determine the long-range environmental impact of producing pits at multiple DOE sites.

The CD-1 estimate for SRPPF is between $6.9 billion and $11.1 billion. That includes an estimated $475 million to convert the failed MOX facility into the pit production plant, according to the FY 2022 federal budget under consideration.

NNSA estimates the project will be completed between 2032 and 2035. The plan calls for SRPPF to produce 50 pits a year.

The lawsuit is available at: https://uploads-ssl.webflow.com/5f2c352f324853b8b51c50db/60db415102377c2070fd3b19_Complaint.pdf

Dana Lynn McIntyre is a Staff Reporter with The Augusta Press. You can reach her at dana@theaugustapress.com.

[adrotate banner=”49″]

What to Read Next

The Author

Dana Lynn McIntyre is an award-winning reporter who began working in radio news in her hometown of Johnstown, Pennsylvania. She also worked as a television news photographer for a station in Altoona, Pennsylvania. Dana moved to Savannah, Ga. in 1984 to join the news team at WIXV-FM/I95 Radio. In early 1986, WBBQ Radio in Augusta invited her to interview for a position with the news department. Within three weeks, Dana was living in Olde Town and working at a legendary radio station. Dana left WBBQ in 1996 to join WJBF NewsChannel 6 as assignment manager. In 1998 she became a reporter/anchor covering law enforcement, crime and courts as well as witnessing two executions, one in Georgia, the other in South Carolina. She also spent time as an assignment manager-editor in Atlanta, metro New York City, and back in Augusta at WRDW Television. Dana joined The Augusta Press team in April 2021. Among Dana’s awards from the Georgia Associated Press Broadcasters Association are for Excellence in General Assignment Reporting, Spot News and Specialized Reporting. Dana also received an award for Public Service Reporting from the West Augusta Rotary Club for a story with actor LeVar Burton on his PBS Television show “Reading Rainbow."

Comment Policy

The Augusta Press encourages and welcomes reader comments; however, we request this be done in a respectful manner, and we retain the discretion to determine which comments violate our comment policy. We also reserve the right to hide, remove and/or not allow your comments to be posted.

The types of comments not allowed on our site include:

  • Threats of harm or violence
  • Profanity, obscenity, or vulgarity, including images of or links to such material
  • Racist comments
  • Victim shaming and/or blaming
  • Name calling and/or personal attacks;
  • Comments whose main purpose are to sell a product or promote commercial websites or services;
  • Comments that infringe on copyrights;
  • Spam comments, such as the same comment posted repeatedly on a profile.