Editorial: It’s time to get the city charter review going

Editorial

Date: January 06, 2025

When Augusta commissioners meet on Jan. 7 for the first time this year, several protocol actions will be on the agenda, such as choosing a mayor pro tem and assigning committees. But the most important issue before the new commission will be to get the ball rolling on a charter committee.

Augusta/Richmond County has long languished under a broken form of government. The hyphenated name says it all: the original charter represented a shotgun marriage between two hesitant participants.

It is time to form a united Augusta government for a united citizenry.

The newest members of the commission, Don Clark and Tina Slendak, have had plenty of time, both as concerned citizens and commissioners-elect, to be up to speed on the next step in the process.

Keep in mind that a full review of the charter was one of Mayor Garnett Johnson’s campaign pledges, and January’s meeting will mark his second year in office. No one has has been rash in trying to move the measure forward.

The loudest voices against progress have either been removed from the panel by voters or relegated to a super minority. Therefore, we call on the commission to hit the ground in 2025 running and kick-start the progress toward a more efficient government.

What to Read Next

The Author

Comment Policy

The Augusta Press encourages and welcomes reader comments; however, we request this be done in a respectful manner, and we retain the discretion to determine which comments violate our comment policy. We also reserve the right to hide, remove and/or not allow your comments to be posted.

The types of comments not allowed on our site include:

  • Threats of harm or violence
  • Profanity, obscenity, or vulgarity, including images of or links to such material
  • Racist comments
  • Victim shaming and/or blaming
  • Name calling and/or personal attacks;
  • Comments whose main purpose are to sell a product or promote commercial websites or services;
  • Comments that infringe on copyrights;
  • Spam comments, such as the same comment posted repeatedly on a profile.