Fate of historic church remains undetermined

At right, Historic Preservation Commission Vice Chairman Dave Barbee and Chairwoman Tara Conway speak to the Augusta Commission Feb. 4.

Date: February 06, 2025

Augusta remains at an impasse over the future of a historic Baptist church while some city leaders continue to question the role of the Historic Preservation Commission.

The matter hit the spotlight last month at a public hearing, when the HPC notified owners of the historic former First Baptist Church at 802 Greene St. that it must take steps to properly mothball the property to prevent its further deterioration.

The 1902 church, considered a “significant example” of Beaux Arts architecture and the birthplace of the Southern Baptist Convention, is on the National Register of Historic Places as well as Georgia Trust for Historic Preservation’s list of “Places in Peril.

“It’s on Historic Augusta’s Endangered Properties list and sits in the downtown historic district subject to review by the HPC, said Dave Barbee, the longtime GOP official currently serving as vice chairman of the HPC.

The church owner, SH Investments, responded last week to the HPC’s demands with an application to demolish the church, citing cost concerns. The Augusta Press Publisher and owner Joe Edge is a principal with the ownership group.

Speaking to the Augusta Commission Tuesday, Barbee detailed the HPC’s public hearing process and denied claims the HPC was singling out the church or its owners for upkeep issues. 

“We just believe that we were doing our due diligence as appointed by the commission,” he said. “All we’re looking at is the building, and that’s it.”

Commissioner Wayne Guilfoyle questioned why the HPC hadn’t taken the Augusta Commission’s direction from last year to examine operations at other HPCs to determine ways to improve.

“We receive so many negative things about the HPC,” Guilfoyle said. They include claims of “hostility,” a superior attitude and an unwillingness to compromise, he said.

Planning Director Carla DeLaney said the reason the HPC board never undertook an outside review is that members moved her meeting presentation about it to “some time in 2025.”

“There has never been an opportunity to carry out the directive,” DeLaney said.

Commissioner Jordan Johnson questioned how the board handles similar problematic properties downtown, such as former Woolworth’s, Kress and Belk buildings.

Barbee said in most cases, the owners “have a plan,” although the HPC has little authority to force work to be done.

“We don’t have a way of forcing them to do it,” he said.

Commissioner Catherine Smith Rice said while she is a “huge advocate” for preservation, she felt like Edge was on trial at the public hearing.

“I felt like it was personal,” she said. “If it were my way, I’d like to make a motion to have Legal amend the ordinance so something like this won’t happen again.”

Commissioner Tina Slendak said she was “also really disappointed in the way that Mr. Edge was spoken to” but did not want to see the church demolished.

Commissioner Alvin Mason said after all his years on the commission, it appeared buildings aren’t treated equally downtown.

“Depending on who the property owner is, is what the decision is,” he said.

Barbee said the HPC will rule on Edge’s demolition application at its next meeting Feb. 27.

What to Read Next

The Author

Susan McCord is a veteran journalist and writer who began her career at publications in Asheville, N.C. She spent nearly a decade at newspapers across rural southwest Georgia, then returned to her Augusta hometown for a position at the print daily. She’s a graduate of the Academy of Richmond County and the University of Georgia. Susan is dedicated to transparency and ethics, both in her work and in the beats she covers. She is the recipient of multiple awards, including a Ravitch Fiscal Reporting Fellowship, first place for hard news writing from the Georgia Press Association and the Morris Communications Community Service Award.

Comment Policy

The Augusta Press encourages and welcomes reader comments; however, we request this be done in a respectful manner, and we retain the discretion to determine which comments violate our comment policy. We also reserve the right to hide, remove and/or not allow your comments to be posted.

The types of comments not allowed on our site include:

  • Threats of harm or violence
  • Profanity, obscenity, or vulgarity, including images of or links to such material
  • Racist comments
  • Victim shaming and/or blaming
  • Name calling and/or personal attacks;
  • Comments whose main purpose are to sell a product or promote commercial websites or services;
  • Comments that infringe on copyrights;
  • Spam comments, such as the same comment posted repeatedly on a profile.