Former Augusta mayor sues ex-wife over divorce settlement violations

Former Mayor Hardie Davis, left, and Evett Williams

Date: June 23, 2025

Former Augusta Mayor Hardie Davis has filed a lawsuit against his former wife for not complying with their divorce settlement by disparaging him publicly and not refinancing their former home in her name.

The couple divorced after 27 years in 2023 as Davis was completing his second term as mayor. The bitter split included allegations from his ex-wife of Davis’ adultery with a city-paid consultant.

Davis’ former wife Evett has since remarried and is now Evett Williams. Davis and Williams, both pastors, maintain an interest in politics and Williams registered a campaign for county commissioner in April.

Davis also launched his campaign for chairman of the Democratic Party of Georgia in the spring. The statewide title, a full-time position, is elected by ranking party members.

It was around the time of his campaign for chairman Davis contends Williams broke their agreement not to disparage one another.

Williams violated the settlement provision by “making disparaging remarks about petitioner to a third party, who subsequently posted petitioner’s private information about the marriage on social media and Youtube,” according to Davis’ May 19 complaint.

Attached to the petition are a handful of photocopied screen-grabs appearing to show the disparaging content. None of them mention Davis or Williams by name but they include photos closely resembling the former mayor and showing him with another woman. 

“This is your next Democratic chairperson or your next governor, according to him,” said the poster. “He stood before the church and denied everything, lied on his wife, who is a great friend of my wife and I KNOW HIM,” said another.

The settlement agreement includes a sweeping ban on publishing on “any public medium,” social media or “electronic messaging to any third persons” any comments critical of the other. These could include disparaging or derogatory remarks, criticisms or statements that interfere with his or business interests, employment, personal and public life, it said.

Williams got the marital home, its mortgage, a second house which has been sold and Davis’ city retirement in the divorce. The settlement calls for her to refinance the loan in her name alone and take over payments.

According to Davis, two years have passed and Williams has not refinanced the loan.

Property records show Davis deeded the house to Williams around the time of their divorce and that Williams is listed as owner.

The five judges of the Augusta Judicial Circuit recused themselves from the case  June 9. Williams has not responded to the lawsuit.

What to Read Next

The Author

Susan McCord is a veteran journalist and writer who began her career at publications in Asheville, N.C. She spent nearly a decade at newspapers across rural southwest Georgia, then returned to her Augusta hometown for a position at the print daily. She’s a graduate of the Academy of Richmond County and the University of Georgia. Susan is dedicated to transparency and ethics, both in her work and in the beats she covers. She is the recipient of multiple awards, including a Ravitch Fiscal Reporting Fellowship, first place for hard news writing from the Georgia Press Association and the Morris Communications Community Service Award. **Not involved with Augusta Press editorials

Comment Policy

The Augusta Press encourages and welcomes reader comments; however, we request this be done in a respectful manner, and we retain the discretion to determine which comments violate our comment policy. We also reserve the right to hide, remove and/or not allow your comments to be posted.

The types of comments not allowed on our site include:

  • Threats of harm or violence
  • Profanity, obscenity, or vulgarity, including images of or links to such material
  • Racist comments
  • Victim shaming and/or blaming
  • Name calling and/or personal attacks;
  • Comments whose main purpose are to sell a product or promote commercial websites or services;
  • Comments that infringe on copyrights;
  • Spam comments, such as the same comment posted repeatedly on a profile.