McMaster Gathers Input on Allocating $525 million SRS Settlement

S.C. Gov. Henry McMaster at the town hall meeting. Staff photo by Dana Lynn McIntyre

Date: August 23, 2021

South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster sought input on how to divide the $525 million Savannah River Site settlement money at a town hall meeting at the University of South Carolina-Aiken campus on Aug. 20.

Elected leaders of Aiken, Barnwell and Allendale counties, along with the mayors of the city of Aiken and North Augusta told the governor their municipalities have felt the brunt of the impact from the site and deserve all the money.

MORE: Skyrocketing Budget Requested for the Savannah River Site

The money, originally $600 million until $75 million was paid to the attorneys, stems from the Department of Energy’s failed mixed oxide fuel fabrication that was to be built at SRS along with the weapons grade plutonium that was brought to the state to be converted into fuel pellets for reactor fuel assemblies.

McMaster also heard from Rep. Joe Wilson (R-SC), state Rep. Bill Clyburn (D-Aiken) and state Sen. Tom Young (R-Aiken), who gave a summary of what led up to the lawsuit that ended with the awarding of what Attorney General Alan Wilson called the largest settlement in South Carolina’s history.

[adrotate banner=”19″]


Young explained the 2002 agreement to bring plutonium to SRS and build the MOX facility included a penalty payment if the terms of the agreement were not fulfilled, including the removal of the plutonium from SRS if the MOX project was not built. The federal government would have to pay South Carolina a $1 million a day, up to a $100 million impact fee. The MOX project was terminated in 2018. The deal to settle a lawsuit was announced in 2020.

SRS straddles Aiken, Barnwell and Allendale counties. Young said the three counties deserve the money.

“The vast majority of these funds should be invested in these three counties that have been impacted by the failure of the federal government to fulfill the MOX project,” said Young. “The settlement document itself says the $600 million dollar payment is for, quote, ‘economic and impact assistance.'”

Young listed several projects worthy of funding with the settlement money, including the New Savannah Bluff Lock and Dam. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers wants to remove the aging and deteriorating structure and replace it with a rock weir to allow for fish migration. Young said keeping the structure in place will protect the riverfront along Aiken County and North Augusta.

North Augusta Mayor Briton Williams agreed, saying that, “Maintaining the water level of that river and functionality of the lock and dam are critical for the industries in Aiken County and the city of North Augusta. We’ve already seen what will happen if the water level is lowered without the lock and dam. Our beautiful river became a mud flat.”

[adrotate banner=”54″]


Other ways to invest the money in the three counties included working with Fort Gordon and the city of Augusta to expand cyber capabilities, paying for the Whiskey Road corridor and Powerhouse Road connector in Aiken as well as education, infrastructure, expanding broadband coverage and economic development across all three counties.

During a news conference following the meeting, McMaster said the state has a rare opportunity to make transformative change in the future of South Carolina.

MORE: DOE Greenlights Pit Production at SRS, Environmental Groups File Suit to Stop It

“This is a lot of money, and we need to be very careful,” he said. “I was very interested in the depth of understanding and insight that was presented by the speakers.”

Leaders and citizens in the three counties have been concerned that some of the money will be siphoned off and used in counties across the state. McMaster said he believes most of the money needs to stay in Aiken, Barnwell and Allendale counties.

In addition to the money, the settlement calls for the Department of Energy to remove the plutonium stored at SRS. It must be removed no later than 2037.

Dana Lynn McIntyre is a Staff Reporter with The Augusta Press. You can reach her at dana@theaugustapress.com.


[adrotate banner=”51″]

What to Read Next

The Author

Dana Lynn McIntyre is an award-winning reporter who began working in radio news in her hometown of Johnstown, Pennsylvania. She also worked as a television news photographer for a station in Altoona, Pennsylvania. Dana moved to Savannah, Ga. in 1984 to join the news team at WIXV-FM/I95 Radio. In early 1986, WBBQ Radio in Augusta invited her to interview for a position with the news department. Within three weeks, Dana was living in Olde Town and working at a legendary radio station. Dana left WBBQ in 1996 to join WJBF NewsChannel 6 as assignment manager. In 1998 she became a reporter/anchor covering law enforcement, crime and courts as well as witnessing two executions, one in Georgia, the other in South Carolina. She also spent time as an assignment manager-editor in Atlanta, metro New York City, and back in Augusta at WRDW Television. Dana joined The Augusta Press team in April 2021. Among Dana’s awards from the Georgia Associated Press Broadcasters Association are for Excellence in General Assignment Reporting, Spot News and Specialized Reporting. Dana also received an award for Public Service Reporting from the West Augusta Rotary Club for a story with actor LeVar Burton on his PBS Television show “Reading Rainbow."

Comment Policy

The Augusta Press encourages and welcomes reader comments; however, we request this be done in a respectful manner, and we retain the discretion to determine which comments violate our comment policy. We also reserve the right to hide, remove and/or not allow your comments to be posted.

The types of comments not allowed on our site include:

  • Threats of harm or violence
  • Profanity, obscenity, or vulgarity, including images of or links to such material
  • Racist comments
  • Victim shaming and/or blaming
  • Name calling and/or personal attacks;
  • Comments whose main purpose are to sell a product or promote commercial websites or services;
  • Comments that infringe on copyrights;
  • Spam comments, such as the same comment posted repeatedly on a profile.