The Augusta Press files suit over access to domestic violence call at prosecutor’s home

First Amendment of the US Constitution text, with other Constitution text above. Photo courtesy of istockphoto.com

Date: June 22, 2022

The Augusta Press is suing the Richmond County Sheriff’s Department over its refusal to turn over any information concerning the call for sheriff officers to respond to possible domestic violence at the home of the second in command of the Richmond County Solicitor’s office.

On May 3, a friend of the Chief Assistant Solicitor Geoffrey Alls’ family called 911 after hearing over the phone yelling and sounds of someone being hit, according to the 911 call. She had been on the phone with Alls’ wife until the call abruptly ended. Alls was not arrested that day, but his now-estranged wife obtained a temporary order of protection based on allegations of his violence that day.

MORE: 911 calls of domestic violence at prosecutor’s Augusta home released

The Augusta Press asked for a copy of the incident report and for the responding officers’ body cam video from the May 3 call, but the request was rejected. The Richmond County Sheriff Office’s public information officer responded that the incident report and everything related to the call was not subject to the state’s Open Records Act. The sheriff’s PIO officer cited the statute requiring all law enforcement agencies to file specific report forms for every domestic violence call. The required reports must be filed with the Georgia Bureau of Investigation, even when no arrest is made although those reports are considered for statistical purpose only and not subject to the Open Records Act.

The Augusta Press’ attorney David Hudson disagreed with the sheriff’s analysis of the law. On May 20, The newspaper filed a formal request under the Open Records Act asking again for the information about the Alls’ call. The department’s attorney told Hudson the department’s position hasn’t changed.

The lawsuit filed Tuesday, June 21, in Richmond County Superior Court seeks a judge’s ruling that the incident report and body cam video for the sheriff’s call to Alls’ home should be released under the state’s Open Records Act.

Alls, who is currently on administrative leave, is the second person in charge of the office responsible for prosecuting the majority of domestic violence cases in Richmond County.

The lawsuit, which represents only one side of the legal dispute, also seeks a $1,000 penalty to be imposed for violation of the Open Records Act and attorney fees.

Sandy Hodson is a staff reporter covering courts for The Augusta Press. Reach her at sandy@theaugustapress.com. 

What to Read Next

The Author

Award-winning journalist Sandy Hodson The Augusta Press courts reporter. She is a native of Indiana, but she has been an Augusta resident since 1995 when she joined the staff of the Augusta Chronicle where she covered courts and public affairs. Hodson is a graduate of Ball State University, and she holds a certificate in investigative reporting from the Investigative Reporters and Editors organization. Before joining the Chronicle, Hodson spent six years at the Jackson, Tenn. Sun. Hodson received the prestigious Georgia Press Association Freedom of Information Award in 2015, and she has won press association awards for investigative reporting, non-deadline reporting, hard news reporting, public service and specialty reporting. In 2000, Hodson won the Georgia Bar Association’s Silver Gavel Award, and in 2001, she received Honorable Mention for the same award and is a fellow of the National Press Foundation and a graduate of the National Institute for Computer-Assisted Reporting boot camp.

Comment Policy

The Augusta Press encourages and welcomes reader comments; however, we request this be done in a respectful manner, and we retain the discretion to determine which comments violate our comment policy. We also reserve the right to hide, remove and/or not allow your comments to be posted.

The types of comments not allowed on our site include:

  • Threats of harm or violence
  • Profanity, obscenity, or vulgarity, including images of or links to such material
  • Racist comments
  • Victim shaming and/or blaming
  • Name calling and/or personal attacks;
  • Comments whose main purpose are to sell a product or promote commercial websites or services;
  • Comments that infringe on copyrights;
  • Spam comments, such as the same comment posted repeatedly on a profile.