Attorneys clash over potential liability over shooting at Augusta Mall

Photo credit: Chinnapong Photo courtesy: istock.com

Date: June 16, 2022


The attorney for the owners of the Augusta Mall succeeded Wednesday, June 15, in convincing a judge that its security company will bear the financial burden if it is found negligent in a shooting at the mall in October 2020.

The Oct. 3, 2020, shooting left 26-year-old Derell D. Little dead. An innocent bystander, Aubrey Adams-Knowlden, was shot in her right knee. She was working at a kiosk in the center of the mall when a fight broke out between Little and Tony Burton.

MORE: 911 calls of domestic violence at prosecutor’s Augusta home released

Adams-Knowlden filed a Richmond County Superior Court lawsuit Dec. 10, 2020, alleging the owners of the mall and its security firm, Andy Frain Services Inc., were negligent in their responsibility to keep the Wrightsboro Road shopping mall safe for patrons and employees.

On Wednesday, attorneys for the mall owners and Andy Frain Services appeared before Judge Jesse Stone to argue their positions on whether and how Andy Frain could be found liable for any financial damages that might result from Adams-Knowlden’s lawsuit.

Tracy O’Connell told the judge that the mall owners’ contract with Andy Frain Services specifically required the security company to assume insurance coverage up to $5 million and legal defense if the security company is found at fault.

MORE: College student arrested in father’s killing in Atlanta area

Andy Frain Services’ attorney Glenn Bass countered that the mall owners are still responsible for their own duty to keep the mall safe, and they should cover their own liabilities. While a jury may find Andy Frain itself liable for some damages, the mall owners’ still have the overall responsibility for keeping the mall safe, he said.

Adams-Knowlden’s attorney Harry Revell told the judge that the lawsuit claims both entitles were negligent and therefore they are liable for damages, and that the plaintiff has an expert opinion the security company was negligent in providing security.

Stone ruled Andry Frain Services will bear responsibility if it is shown it breached its duty under the contract with the mall, and that the contract does require insurance coverage for the mall owners.
The parties are to take part in mediation later this month.

Sandy Hodson is a staff reporter covering courts for The Augusta Press. Reach her at sandy@theaugustapress.com.

What to Read Next

The Author

Award-winning journalist Sandy Hodson The Augusta Press courts reporter. She is a native of Indiana, but she has been an Augusta resident since 1995 when she joined the staff of the Augusta Chronicle where she covered courts and public affairs. Hodson is a graduate of Ball State University, and she holds a certificate in investigative reporting from the Investigative Reporters and Editors organization. Before joining the Chronicle, Hodson spent six years at the Jackson, Tenn. Sun. Hodson received the prestigious Georgia Press Association Freedom of Information Award in 2015, and she has won press association awards for investigative reporting, non-deadline reporting, hard news reporting, public service and specialty reporting. In 2000, Hodson won the Georgia Bar Association’s Silver Gavel Award, and in 2001, she received Honorable Mention for the same award and is a fellow of the National Press Foundation and a graduate of the National Institute for Computer-Assisted Reporting boot camp.

Comment Policy

The Augusta Press encourages and welcomes reader comments; however, we request this be done in a respectful manner, and we retain the discretion to determine which comments violate our comment policy. We also reserve the right to hide, remove and/or not allow your comments to be posted.

The types of comments not allowed on our site include:

  • Threats of harm or violence
  • Profanity, obscenity, or vulgarity, including images of or links to such material
  • Racist comments
  • Victim shaming and/or blaming
  • Name calling and/or personal attacks;
  • Comments whose main purpose are to sell a product or promote commercial websites or services;
  • Comments that infringe on copyrights;
  • Spam comments, such as the same comment posted repeatedly on a profile.