Augusta DA responds to injunction denial in prosecuting attorney council lawsuit

The Augusta Judicial Center and John H. Ruffin Jr. Courthouse is home to the Augusta Circuit's five judges. Photo courtesy of Augusta, Georgia

The Augusta Judicial Center and John H. Ruffin Jr. Courthouse is home to the Augusta Circuit's superior, civil and magistrate, probate and state courts. Photo courtesy of Augusta, Georgia

Date: July 27, 2024

The efforts of a new state commission to police prosecutors will continue as planned after a judge denied three Georgia district attorneys’ request for a preliminary injunction.

The lawsuit and a companion case are the latest filed by Augusta Circuit District Attorney Jared Williams and other Georgia DAs challenging the establishment and authority of the Prosecuting Attorneys Qualifications Commission.

MORE: ‘Very, very thankful’: Jury clears deputy of disorderly conduct charge

Augusta District Attorney Jared Williams

Williams was again joined by Stone Mountain Circuit DA Sherry Boston, a Democrat, and Republican Jonathan Adams of the Towaliga Judicial Circuit, in  challenging the commission.

They are three of the four who took on the commission last year in a case that was later dismissed.

Fulton County Superior Court Judge Paige Reese Whitaker denied the injunction request Tuesday. 

Williams said the procedural decision was not a final ruling on the merits.

“We are committed to continuing our fight against this unconstitutional overreach by the state as our challenge makes its way through the courts,” he said.

Senate Bill 92’s lead sponsors, Sen. John F. Kennedy, R-Macon, and Sen. Randy Robertson, R-Cataula, said the setback was cause for the plaintiffs to drop their case.

“To continue this challenge is an injustice to crime victims in our communities, as well as to Georgia taxpayers having to shoulder the expense of this frivolous case,” Kennedy said.

In Reese’s ruling, she noted that the commission had initiated no actual investigation or disciplinary proceeding against a prosecutor.

The Georgia constitution permits the legislature to regulate prosecutors, including requiring them to review every case for potential prosecution, she held. 

The public’s interest is presumably being served, because the laws are created by leaders elected by the people, the opinion said.

The Tuesday ruling isn’t the last word on the lawsuit. The court still has to rule on a May motion filed by the defendants to dismiss it.

The commission’s work, meanwhile, is likely to pick up next month.

The commission’s investigative panel announced July 11 it has hired Savannah prosecutor Ian Heap as its first executive director. 

When he begins work Aug. 1, Heap will lead investigations into complaints of misconduct by district attorneys and solicitors general, according to a news release.

What to Read Next

The Author

Susan McCord is a veteran journalist and writer who began her career at publications in Asheville, N.C. She spent nearly a decade at newspapers across rural southwest Georgia, then returned to her Augusta hometown for a position at the print daily. She’s a graduate of the Academy of Richmond County and the University of Georgia. Susan is dedicated to transparency and ethics, both in her work and in the beats she covers. She is the recipient of multiple awards, including a Ravitch Fiscal Reporting Fellowship, first place for hard news writing from the Georgia Press Association and the Morris Communications Community Service Award. **Not involved with Augusta Press editorials

Comment Policy

The Augusta Press encourages and welcomes reader comments; however, we request this be done in a respectful manner, and we retain the discretion to determine which comments violate our comment policy. We also reserve the right to hide, remove and/or not allow your comments to be posted.

The types of comments not allowed on our site include:

  • Threats of harm or violence
  • Profanity, obscenity, or vulgarity, including images of or links to such material
  • Racist comments
  • Victim shaming and/or blaming
  • Name calling and/or personal attacks;
  • Comments whose main purpose are to sell a product or promote commercial websites or services;
  • Comments that infringe on copyrights;
  • Spam comments, such as the same comment posted repeatedly on a profile.