Bill seeking vote on giving Augusta mayor a vote passes state senate

Georgia Senate Bill 231, asking Augusta voters whether to give the mayor a vote on the commission, passed the senate Monday along party lines.

Georgia Senate Bill 231, asking Augusta voters whether to give the mayor a vote on the commission, passed the senate Monday along party lines.

Date: March 07, 2023

A state senate bill asking Augusta voters whether to give the city mayor a full-time vote on the commission passed the senate Monday.

Georgia Senate Bill 231, introduced by Sen. Max Burns, R-Sylvania, passed 32-22, passed along strict party lines with all 22 Democrats present voting against it.

Augusta Mayor Garnett Johnson
Augusta Mayor Garnett Johnson supports a bill asking voters to decide whether to give the mayor a full-time vote on the commission.

The bill passed at 7:49 p.m. in a daylong senate floor session that lasted until nearly 11 p.m.

Burns said the bill would allow Augusta voters to determine through a referendum whether to give the mayor a vote. The 1996 Consolidation Act, which has never been amended, gives the mayor a vote only in the event of a 5-5 tie on the commission, which commissioners strategically block by abstaining.

If voters approve, the bill “would update the charter to allow the Augusta-Richmond County Commission to be a more functioning governing body,” Burns said.

Augusta Mayor Garnett Johnson garnered support for the bill behind the scenes, gaining support from five of the 10 commission members in a resolution requesting it.

Speaking against the bill, Sen. Harold Jones, D-Augusta, said the bill would bypass a larger conversation about changing the charter.


MORE: Augusta Regional Airport will have 13 direct flights for Masters Tournament


“There’s just a split on the community, on the commission about whether he should have a vote, shouldn’t have a vote. It’s not even an ideological split, it’s not even a racial split, but basically… the split, it now comes here to us, and has actually put myself and the senator from the 23rd (Burns) in a bad position,” said Jones, who serves as Democratic whip.

“So what I’m actually asking is that you vote ‘no’ so they can actually have a process to look at their charter and determine what changes they want to make,” he said.

Jones said Augusta had been having additional “ongoing conversations” about giving the city administrator more authority or increasing or decreasing the number of commissioners that might be addressed in a broader examination of the Consolidation Act. He said his opposition was “process-oriented” and geared toward taking a larger look.

“Let them have the opportunity to have those conversations, without not necessarily having this over their heads,” Jones said.

The bill now moves to the state house, where Rep. Mark Newton, R-Augusta, supports it. If the Republican majority similarly favors it, it will go to Gov. Brian Kemp for his signature.

Susan McCord is a staff writer with The Augusta Press. Reach her at susan@theaugustapress.com 

What to Read Next

The Author

Susan McCord is a veteran journalist and writer who began her career at publications in Asheville, N.C. She spent nearly a decade at newspapers across rural southwest Georgia, then returned to her Augusta hometown for a position at the print daily. She’s a graduate of the Academy of Richmond County and the University of Georgia. Susan is dedicated to transparency and ethics, both in her work and in the beats she covers. She is the recipient of multiple awards, including a Ravitch Fiscal Reporting Fellowship, first place for hard news writing from the Georgia Press Association and the Morris Communications Community Service Award. **Not involved with Augusta Press editorials

Comment Policy

The Augusta Press encourages and welcomes reader comments; however, we request this be done in a respectful manner, and we retain the discretion to determine which comments violate our comment policy. We also reserve the right to hide, remove and/or not allow your comments to be posted.

The types of comments not allowed on our site include:

  • Threats of harm or violence
  • Profanity, obscenity, or vulgarity, including images of or links to such material
  • Racist comments
  • Victim shaming and/or blaming
  • Name calling and/or personal attacks;
  • Comments whose main purpose are to sell a product or promote commercial websites or services;
  • Comments that infringe on copyrights;
  • Spam comments, such as the same comment posted repeatedly on a profile.