Referendum on giving Augusta mayor a vote clears senate committee

Augusta Mayor Garnett Johnson

Augusta Mayor Garnett Johnson

Date: February 28, 2023

A bill calling for a referendum on giving Augusta’s mayor a vote cleared a state senate committee Monday, passing 4-2 along party lines.

Sen. Max Burns, R-Sylvania, the lead sponsor of Senate Bill 231, presented it to the Senate Committee on State and Local Government Operations. The bill was the only one considered at the 7 p.m. meeting.

Burns said a referendum, if it passes, would prevent a majority of commissioners from blocking the mayor’s current ability to break 5-5 ties by having one member abstain from voting.

“The issue is there’s a 10-member commission, and when a group of the commissioners do not feel that they’re comfortable with the actions, they choose not to participate so they leave the room,” Burns said.

Augusta commissioners typically don’t leave the room to abstain. They do it openly from their seats in the commission chamber. They aren’t required to give a reason, such as a conflict of interest, and rarely do.

Sen. Derek Mallow, D-Savannah, questioned the effect giving the mayor a vote would have on the commission’s existing voting power.

“With the chair voting in absence of a tie, what does that do in relation to the balance of power for the commission structure already established?” he said.

Burns said it would “allow for the majority to move forward” by adding the mayor’s 11th vote to the commission’s 10.

“What this bill does is it allows the commission to make decisions again,” Burns said. “There’s a lot of challenges. We’ve had some issues with making decisions and taking actions that are critical to the community and we need to be able to allow the commission and the mayor to move the city forward.”

An example was the bill itself, which had support from five commissioners and the mayor but not the commission, Burns said.

Mallow said it could have a different effect.

“It allows the mayor to have his vote potentially not necessarily to break a tie, so the mayor doesn’t have to work to get a majority. He just basically gets to say, “‘Hey, if you vote with me, I’ll get you whatever you want.’ I kind of think that dilutes the will of the people, especially if this is a consolidated form of government,” Mallow said.

The weak mayor-strong commission form of government was created by the bill that consolidated Augusta and Richmond County that voters approved in 1995.

Senate Bill 231 “will determine the will of the people,” Burns said.

The bill calls for a referendum to go on the ballot with next year’s party primaries. Burns said alongside it would be another referendum, on adding another 1% sales tax to fund construction of a new James Brown Arena.

The bill received a “do-pass” from Sen. Rick Williams, R-Milledgeville, and was seconded by Sen. Sam Watson, R-Moultrie. Committee secretary Gloria Butler joined Mallow in voting against it.

What to Read Next

The Author

Susan McCord is a veteran journalist and writer who began her career at publications in Asheville, N.C. She spent nearly a decade at newspapers across rural southwest Georgia, then returned to her Augusta hometown for a position at the print daily. She’s a graduate of the Academy of Richmond County and the University of Georgia. Susan is dedicated to transparency and ethics, both in her work and in the beats she covers. She is the recipient of multiple awards, including a Ravitch Fiscal Reporting Fellowship, first place for hard news writing from the Georgia Press Association and the Morris Communications Community Service Award. **Not involved with Augusta Press editorials

Comment Policy

The Augusta Press encourages and welcomes reader comments; however, we request this be done in a respectful manner, and we retain the discretion to determine which comments violate our comment policy. We also reserve the right to hide, remove and/or not allow your comments to be posted.

The types of comments not allowed on our site include:

  • Threats of harm or violence
  • Profanity, obscenity, or vulgarity, including images of or links to such material
  • Racist comments
  • Victim shaming and/or blaming
  • Name calling and/or personal attacks;
  • Comments whose main purpose are to sell a product or promote commercial websites or services;
  • Comments that infringe on copyrights;
  • Spam comments, such as the same comment posted repeatedly on a profile.